Product Type
Condition
Binding
Collectible Attributes
Free Shipping
Seller Location
Seller Rating
Published by Springer, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: booksXpress, Bayonne, NJ, U.S.A.
Book
Soft Cover. Condition: new.
Published by Springer, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Book
Condition: New.
Published by Springer 2011-11, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
Book
PF. Condition: New.
Published by Springer, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Book Print on Demand
Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book.
Published by Springer Netherlands, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Book
Condition: New.
Published by D. Reidel Publishing Company, 2013
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Book
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 1982 edition. 244 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.58 inches. In Stock.
Published by Springer Netherlands, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Book
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - them in his cheat-preface to Copernicus De Revolutionibus, but the main change in their import has been that whereas Osiander defended Copernicus, Mach and Duhem defended science. The modem conception of hypothetico deductive science is, again, geared to defend the respectability of science in much the same way: the physical interpretation, it says, is merely and always hypothetical, and so the scientist is never really committed to it. Hence, when science sheds the physical interpretation off its mathematical skeleton as time and refutation catch up with it, the scientist is not really caught in error, for he never was committed to this interpretation in the first place. This is the apologetic essence of present day, Popper-like, versions of the idea of science as a mathematical-core-cum-interpretational shell. This is also Cohen's view, for it aims to free Newton of any existential commitment to which his theory might allegedly commit him. It will be readily seen that Cohen regards this methodological distinction between mathematics and physics to be the backbone of the Newtonian revolution in science (which is, in its tum, the climax of the whole Scientific Revolution) for a very clear reason: it enables us to argue that Newton could use freely the new concept of centripetal force, even though he did not be lieve in physical action at a distance and could not conceive how such a force could act to produce its effects'. ([3] pp.
Published by Springer, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: dsmbooks, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Book
Paperback. Condition: Like New. Like New. book.
Published by Springer Netherlands Nov 2011, 2011
ISBN 10: 9400977174ISBN 13: 9789400977174
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -them in his cheat-preface to Copernicus De Revolutionibus, but the main change in their import has been that whereas Osiander defended Copernicus, Mach and Duhem defended science. The modem conception of hypothetico deductive science is, again, geared to defend the respectability of science in much the same way: the physical interpretation, it says, is merely and always hypothetical, and so the scientist is never really committed to it. Hence, when science sheds the physical interpretation off its mathematical skeleton as time and refutation catch up with it, the scientist is not really caught in error, for he never was committed to this interpretation in the first place. This is the apologetic essence of present day, Popper-like, versions of the idea of science as a mathematical-core-cum-interpretational shell. This is also Cohen's view, for it aims to free Newton of any existential commitment to which his theory might allegedly commit him. It will be readily seen that Cohen regards this methodological distinction between mathematics and physics to be the backbone of the Newtonian revolution in science (which is, in its tum, the climax of the whole Scientific Revolution) for a very clear reason: it enables us to argue that Newton could use freely the new concept of centripetal force, even though he did not be lieve in physical action at a distance and could not conceive how such a force could act to produce its effects'. ([3] pp. 256 pp. Englisch.